Model Pembelajaran Double Loop Problem Solving (DLPS) dalam Pembelajaran Fisika pada Materi Gerak Melingkar Beraturan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60132/jip.v1i2.71Keywords:
Learning Models, Double Loop Problem Solving, Circular MotionAbstract
The purpose of writing this article is 1) To explain the DLPS (Double Loop Problem Solving) learning model; 2) To explain the steps of the DLPS (Double Loop Problem Solving) learning model; 3) To explain the advantages and disadvantages of the DLPS (Double Loop Problem Solving) learning model; and 4) To compile the syntax for learning Physics with the DLPS (Double Loop Problem Solving) model in the subject of Circular Motion. The method used in writing this article is the library method. The data analysis techniques in this article are summarizing, presenting theory, and providing conclusions. Based on the discussion that has been done, it can be concluded that 1) DLPS (Dooble-Loop Problem Solving) is a modification of learning problem solving with an emphasis on finding the main causes of the emergence of a given problem; 2) The steps of DLPS (Dooble-Loop Problem Solving) are Identifying the problem, Detecting direct causes, and rapidly applying temporary solutions, Evaluating the success of the temporary solutions, then Deciding if root cause analysis is needed, If so, detecting higher level causes and Designing root causes solutions; 3) The advantages of the DLPS (Double Loop Problem Solving) learning model are practising students to design an invention, think critically, solve problems faced realistically, identify and carry out investigations, interpret and evaluate the results of observations and stimulate the development of students' thinking progress. Disadvantages of the DLPS (Double Loop Problem Solving) learning model are require a longer time allocation, difficulty in evaluating the problem-solving process constantly, difficulty finding the right problem or in accordance with the level of development and abilities of students; and 4) The DLPS (Dooble-Loop Problem Solving) syntax is identification, causal detection, tentative solution, solution consideration, causal analysis and selected solution plan.
References
Argyris, C. (1993). Education for Leading Learning. Organizational Dynamic, 21(3), 4–17.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA : Addison Wesley.
Argyris C, Schon DA. (2002). Organizational Learning : A Theory Practice. Oxford : University Press.
Budiyanto, A. K. (2016). Sintaks 45 Metode Pembelajaran dalam Student centered Learning (SCL). Malang : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Catwright, Sharon. (2002). Double-Loop Learning : A Concept and Process for Leadership Educators. Jurnal of Leadership Education, 1 (1), 68-71.
Freeman & Knight. (2011). Double-Loop Learning and The Global Business Student. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41 (3), 102-127. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ959456
Huda, M. (2015). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogykarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Istarani dan Ridwan. (2014). 50 Tipe Pembeljaran Kooperatif. Medan : CV Media Persada.
Kantamara & Ractham. (2014). Single-Loop Vs. Double-Loop Learning: An Obstacle or A Success Factor for Organizational Learning. International Journal of Education and Research, 2 (7), 55-62.
Kurniasih, Imas. (2015). Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran. Surabaya : Kata Pena
Ngalimun. (2014). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Banjarmasin : Aswaja.
Petrigliere, G., & Petrigliere, J. L. (2010). Identity Workspaces: The Case of Business Schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.1.zqr44
Prastowo, Andi. (2011). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta : DIVA Press.
Shoimin, Aris. (2013). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta : Ar-Ruzz Media.
Skhiri. (2017). Organizational Learning Process in Single, Double and Triple Loop Companies in A Post-Crisis Situation in The Textile Sector in Tunisia. Journal of Entrepeneurship & Organization Management, 6 (2), 1-7. DOI: 10.4172/2169-026X.1000219
Trianto. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara
Tsang, E. W. K. (2002). Acquiring Knowledge by Foreign Partners from International Joint Ventures in A Transition Economy: Learning-By-Doing and Learning Myopia. Strategic Management Journal, No. 23, 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.251
Umiyaroh, F., & Handoyo, B. (2017). The Influence of Double Loop Problem Solving Learning Models to Senior High School Learners Spatial Thinking Ability. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scholarly Research, 1 (1), 27-35.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Yoggi Prastya Batulieu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially